Facebook vs Twitter Case Study Analysis Essay

Facebook (originally The facebook) is a social networking website launched in February 2004 by course Zuckerberg, then 23, slice studying psychology at Harvard University. Membership was initially limited to students of Harvard College, but soon the social site was subsequently all-inclusive to other Boston universities, the Ivy League and eventually all US universities (Yadav, 2006). It became Facebook. com in August 2005 after the sites address was obtained for a relatively meager $200,000. By the end of the following year it was besides open to high schools.As of September 2006, Facebook was extended beyond educational associations to anybody with a registered email address. They have over 175 million spry users worldwide currently and be growing every day. Facebooks armorial bearing statement seems simple Facebooks mission is to give people the advocate to share and make the world more open and connected (Reagan, 2009). cheep still no business model but it has a crude mi ssion statement To instantly connect people everywhere to whats most important to them. (Evans, 2011). Who is better than who? Or wiz could say who is expiry to be the king of the hill?Facebook has tried to purchase chirrup with no success. It is hard to say who will come break through on fade or who will be the ultimate winner of the social war. thither are some key differences between the sites (Lacy, 2009). Its far easier to pay off people on Facebook and most of the time you butt tell if its real them. Facebook and Twitter are twain free sites and are both popular. Facebook and Twitter are both time conversations, but Twitter is a little faster. They both seem to have their good and bad qualities. Twitter has a character restriction and has no popups. Twitter users back end too post to their Facebook page.Facebook does non have a character limit. They both piece of tail post pictures and videos, but Facebook has more capacity for sharing videos and photos without for cing you to link out to a nonher window (Lacy, 2009). Facebook has a better privacy blocking system, if you kitty find it with the ever changing improvements. A lot of users are not aware of this option. Facebook allows businesses to advertise and reach more people faster. Facebook makes thither tax income off the ads on their site, witch keeps it free for their users. Facebook has games for their users to play as well.These games besides generate some of their revenue enhancement. Twitter has no games and the only source of revenue is its investors. Facebook is threatened with losing users to a less familiar, social networking website. The major problem that exists is the point that Twitter has a controlled level of social networking. Facebook does not allow one way interaction options meaning that if I want to follow persons posts then they themselves would have to accept my friend request, and Facebook also does not allow someone to track real time information is endlessly adding improvements that the client base does not like.With this happening it may mean that legion(predicate) Facebook members may leave and start using twitter because of some of the restrictions that are placed on the members of Facebook. The first alternative reply is for Facebook to purchase stellar(prenominal) star technology and offer the capability to track real-time information. This solution will help to eliminate Twitters current advantage of having the capability to track real-time information. Another alternative solution is to phrase a way for one-way relationships to be possible on Facebook, while maintaining its security.Many users want to broadcast their status information, but not actually follow all of their status viewers and get somewhat pissed off with the flow of game postings that clog up their pages. I know I do to the point that I log off and sometimes go and check out Twitter. In conclusion, there will never be a happy medium here. Technology is cons tantly evolving and there will probably be another social network that will be created and pose threats to both of these networks.In my opinion, Facebook is more personal, whereas Twitter is more Hollywood. Facebook deals with contacting out of date friends and family members and Twitter is about following an entertainer. Myspace is simply out of space as there arent really too many users out there anymore. LinkedIn is a way to network via business and doesnt contain the message that any of these sites do, as it wouldnt be professional. Facebook will definitely be around for a long time, as will Twitter. Most cant have one without the other, I know I cant.