12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose

The movie Twelve Angry Men by Reginald pink wine is a drama that dis converges twelve jurors in-depth reasoning to decide a self-colored closing on the defendants sentence. There are troopsy assets and liabilities of the conference that play a role in their decision making. The jurors are all define in terms of their psychealities, backgrounds, prejudices and emotional tilts. This paper will argue that when pride, jealousy, foiling and prejudice all emerge we see irrational and rational decision making methods.The assets of radical is appearancen when juror8 starts a different improvement to evidence by showing the knife that was thought to be rare. It starts the abut of participation in problem solving by other gore members who may have made up their mind or were tho sense of smelling conformity pressure. Greater sum of individuals total information starts to helps panel brand name a better decision. Liabilities of a group are show when every one except juror 8 raise their top by feeling conformity pressure. There is desire of individual shown by juror 3 to dominate and win the argument rather than finding a better(p) solution.Lack of interest is shown by juror 7 to reason or spend time to solve problem. There are prejudice feelings shown by juror 10 and 7, they think juror 5 and 11 do non know much because of their backgrounds. Each group determines assets and liabilities of their groups problem solving. As long disagreement is not personal and is in interest of best solution its healthy. Time required to solve a problem is uncertain, members force get impatient and solve problem without reasoning. Risk taking is either good or bad depending on how a group uses it.Each group has a different problem to solve and different personalities to work with which is wherefore each group can use assets and liabilities positively and negatively. Throughout the film, juryman Ten is violently prejudiced against anyone who comes from a slum. You cant believe a watchword they word, he declares take note that Juror Ten does not say he, meaning the defendant, but they, the group of slums as a whole. This proves that he cannot make a fair judgment about individual guilt.Juror Nine, the senior man with accumulated life experience, notices this and rebukes immediately saying Since when is dishonesty a group characteristic? The intolerance of Juror Ten continues before finally erupting in a long speech that leads the other jurors to reject him. The message is expire that such irrational prejudice is incompatible with justice. Juror Four in addition shows signs of such prejudice, though he couches it in more acceptable language The children who come out of slum backgrounds are potential menaces to society. When a person hears the word prejudice, he or she might think it only refers to the racial prejudice often found between those with light skin and those with immorality skin. However, prejudice runs much deeper than a persons color. Prejudice is found between gender, religion, ethnical and geographical background, and race. People have discriminated against others petty(a)d upon these attributes from the beginning of time. Prejudice has go bad a complex problem in our society for example, if someone were to paseo in a secluded area at night and pass a group of senior citizens, he or she will, most likely, not feel threatened.However, if instead of senior citizens, three teenagers dressed in ripped jeans and t-shirts draining metal chains around their necks passed the person is more likely to feel threatened. Prejudice is the sad truth of todays society. Whether its from observance the local news or reading the newspaper, many people base stereotypes on the media or personal experiences. Although these are the most convenient shipway to judge someone, they are also the worst. Whenever dealing with the media, events are dramatized and slowly conformation into the subconscious. The affects of prejudi ce then influence our decisions without us even realizing it.