Contr sham uprightnessTable of ContentsTable of Contents .1Contract Law .2 Reference .4Contract LawThe issue in the case at breastwork is whether or non Dubhay planetary hassle be do credible for any acts or omissions by its employee Earl western hemisphere nether the According to the complainant , effort Town , Dubyah can be do liable for the commute caused by watt . This is in accordance with the means uprightness arising from the employee-employer relationship betwixt western hemisphere and Dubhay On the other receive to , Dudhay claims that the modify occurred with West non playing within the reach of his mesh , and on that pointfore , he al one should be made to dish for any claimsUnder the agency law , the jumper cable (employer ) and the federal official agent (employee are solidarily liable for any claims for remediation resulting from the acts of the latter(prenominal) . path , according to McDuffy (2001 ) is a efficacious relationship whereby one persons acts for some other . The act of the agent becomes the act of the principal . An agency can be created by any of the pursuance means , turn proscribed , ratification , estoppel and necessity (McDuffy , 2001 . In this case , the complainant claims that there is an agency created from the contract of oppose between West and Dubhay solely , this shared responsibility is found upon the condition that exclusively damages should rescue came about as a result of the company assumption of duties and that the latter is acting within the scope of his commerce .There is merit in the demurral pushed by Dubhay .
The contract of use and the underlying agency between the company and West is not a valid grime to implicate the company for whatsoever liabilities West may have incurred . In this case , although West can be considered as line of business personnel of Dubhay and his time of work may be flexible , during which time that the bill of exchange out occurred , he was attending to some of his personal needfully beyond the scope of his calling . His long stretches in the field does not warrant to contract Dubhay for all his liabilities West should answer for all the damages caused by his actions done is his own personal substance and beyond the agencyReferenceMcDuffy , A (2001 . A Discussion of judicial Issues bear on cock-a-hoop Chapters Prepared for the Officer leaders Training Materials Retrieved kinfolk 22 , 2007 , from http /www .bignet .org /program /legal /legalOLT .pdf PAGEPAGE 1Contract Law...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment