Greil Marcus article was mainly closely how he viewing unlike kinds situation and events that basis be seen under as historic resultant, such as entertainment-films and books. Marcus?s believed that memorial is a knightly and it would never exist at every(prenominal) if we peoples not spill to create iodin. But we all merchant ship palliate throw away an opportunity to viewing that other(prenominal) any clip by present books for references, read old newspapers and watch historical movies to furbish up the idea of what chronicle is real meant to be. But sometime the sources that we were looking at can be false, which mean the information is consider as inaccurate, because it?s already a past and we cannot prove if the point is effective or not. History is what was shape by us, we ar the oneness who form it in every angle way.
One of Greil Marcus name that does really catch my attention is when he discusses about observation a drama and commercial on the television that he would believed none of that can be seen under as bill. Marcus stated, ?? record? it?s over, and it is understood that it never existed at all.? I can whole tone Marcus tone in this statement that he?s very confident of what he said. I soulfulnessally admit the same feeling as Marcus does, we all live for the future, universal would consider as a new day, fresh, and unpredicted incident that would challenge in life. What call history is what had happened long time ago, we people face miserable, separation during wars and being racist by other race. And now that our country had conquered that, we gain the control in today world, and we no longer surrounded by those past incidents. Only distinct nationalities peoples would consider we?re history to them, because they go in?t know who we are.
Marcus?s discussed that when we ?thank to a teacher, a book, or disruptions of an unpredicted historical even-that what one has always been told is incomplete, plump forward, false, a lie.? What Marcus meant by this is that everything we learned would consider as base on sources, such as teacher, book, etc. We gain our knowledge from them, and they are the one who gain their understanding from higher sources. But one of the sources that shouldn?t be relying on is historical event, because at that place is no way we can prove whether it?s a fact or it?s a lie. The historical event would be passing down from one person to another person and to the next. All we learn from it would be untrustworthiness information that the fibber want to attract the listener, which is us who are the victim.
The author formerly believed that ?history is a kind of legend, and we do understand or sense, without quite knowing how or why.? I do feel the same way about his quote, something that we have no precise thought or any idea about the history can be recall as a legend.
Because we tangle with?t know the truth that lie behind it, history then become mystery to everyone and we all live in the world of wonder, whether if there?s anyone going to resolve the task nor we have to keep on imagine of what history is really was like. However, we understand just now a vivid of what it signifies, but still when discuss about the word ?history? we always chance upon it as past, and so the past always remain as a question to each one of us, we then imagine it as a beautiful legend.
Throughout Greil Marcus article, I alleged(a) that Marcus is a man with lot of discovers in life about history and how he can recognize them in different category. In some way I do bear to what the author said, it does make sense. History is a past and we all should live in the present and for the future, there would be no past if we?re not creating one by our own. The moderateness it?s a past because we have no back up proof to prove if the fact is precise or flawed, but then now we all can experience the present, things that rattling happen all around us, observe each and every obstacle everyday in life, then there would be no such history can occur. It only occurs when no one can tell the truth of where it was actually hidden at. But nevertheless, history can happen as allowing for our next generation to experience and understand the background of their archetypal generation, which is our past.
Work Cited: Marcus, Greil. The Dustbin of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP 1989
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment